Search for: "MARK MCCLESKEY" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2012, 10:12 am by Steve Hall
There will be more on McCleskey, I'm certain, in the upcoming Race and the Death Penalty symposium at the University at Albany symposium, marking the contribution of David Baldus' papers to the University's National Death Penalty Archive. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
The case marks the last that the Supreme Court realistically might have held that capital punishment violates the Eighth Amendment of the U.S. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:58 pm by Suzanne Ito
By Diann Rust-Tierney April 22 marked the 25th anniversary of the Supreme Court decision in McCleskey v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 10:42 am by Steve Hall
  It will mark the the addition of the Baldus' personal papers to the National Death Penalty Archive, at UAlbany. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:32 pm by Lovechilde
Kemp,” which was held in March of 2007 to mark the 20th anniversary of the McCleskey decision. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 6:20 pm by Jessica Monaco, ACLU
If Germany Had the Death Penalty: a Thought Experiment April 22 marks the 25th anniversary of the Supreme Court decision in McCleskey v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 1:43 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Mark Wagnon devotes himself to other legal matters, which consist in large part of transactional work. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 9:02 am by Suzanne Ito
To mark the 25th anniversary of the Supreme Court decision in McCleskey v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm by Steve Hall
But in a 5-4 vote, the justices in McCleskey swatted it all away, carving out an exception for death-penalty cases. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 6:42 am by Jim Sedor
Rubio’s Demise Marks the Last Gasp of the Republican RebootWashington Post – Robert Costa and Philip Rucker | Published: 3/15/2016 U.S. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 7:56 am by Alicia Maule
Ritchie and Kay Whitlock Race and the Death Penalty: The Legacy of “McCleskey v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:48 pm by Riann Winget
Krishnamurthi and Salib asserted that Students for Fair Admissions will have little practical effect because of cases such as McCleskey v. [read post]